Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Stanley Kubrick's Napoleon Screenplay


My initial reaction to reading the script is that it seems unfinished.  I'm a huge Kubrick fan, but I didn't see the greatness in the script.  It has Kubrick touches, but just seems to be a disconnected biography of Napoleon consisting of his love life and his political life.  The script is dated September 29, 1969 and I think this must not be the completed version.  I didn't fully understand the history or story of Napoleon as a historical figure.  I could see why Kubrick liked him as a character because they seem to have similar personalities.  

One tendency for writer/directors is to not fully explain everything in the screenplay.  Perhaps this is what was going on with Kubrick in this script.  This was his passion project and I'm sure there is much more that is not contained in this version of the screenplay that Kubrick had in mind.  Kubrick said in an interview, "There'll be no screenplay of Barry Lyndon published, because there is nothing of literary interest to read."  If you see the attached picture of one of the screenplay pages from Barry Lyndon found in the Stanley Kubrick archives, you'll see why this is true.  I'm sure the same would be true of Napoleon if it would have ever been produced.  
Barry Lyndon screenplay page from Stanley Kubrick Archives.

Kubrick did enormous amounts of research on Napoleon including costumes, european locations and historical information.  The story is that when the Napoleon movie was shut down, he moved all the work he had done i

nto making Barry Lyndon.  There are many similarities between this Napoleon script and Barry Lyndon.  There is is similar progression in the plot.  It's hard to imagine that Kubrick thought of Barry Lyndon after Napoleon.  Maybe he had read the book series before or during his preparation on Napoleon.  The picture below is from the Kubrick exhibit at LACMA and consists of the books dedicated entirely to researching Napoleon.  It's hard to imagine that this library produced only this current screenplay.  
Books used for Kubrick's research of Napoleon.  At LACMA.

I wasn't impressed with the screenplay of Napoleon, but I'm sure if he had made the film it would have been amazing and epic.  Kubrick, at the hight of his powers, working on his most passionate project, would have certainly produced one of the greatest films of all time.  

Friday, October 4, 2013

Parables and Screenplays


Parables

The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?”
He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them." 
Matthew 13:10-17

Jesus spoke to people in parables because that was how he could get his message across.  Basically he was teaching people something they didn't understand yet.  The way he did that was by telling people stories they could relate to with the meaning he was trying to get across to them.

This is a great lesson for Christian screenwriters who want to get a message out in their screenplays.  One mistake screenwriters can fall into when trying to write a screenplay with a strong message in it is to make the message obvious and preachy.  Within a few minutes of watching the movie, it'll be obvious that the story is teaching a lesson.  It kills the art of the screenplay because it might as well be a sermon not a screenplay.

Just like Jesus taught people in parables, so should Christian screenwriters hide their messages in the story of the screenplay.    If a screenplay is for Christians with a Christian message, it's preaching to the choir.  The audience already knows the message.  There's no reason to tell the story.  If there is a message you want your audience to grasp, it needs to be something they don't know yet.  If they don't know it yet, then do what Jesus did and tell it in a parable.  As a screenwriter, the job is to tell the story in a unique way that plays out and adds up to message you are trying to get across.

Sometimes talking directly to people about the message doesn't work because maybe they don't want to hear it or don't understand it.  A story or screenplay can get through that without the audience even realizing it.  This is one of the reasons stories are so powerful.  Jesus knew what he was doing.  Try being like him and write your screenplay as a parable.

Friday, September 6, 2013

List of Current Auteur Filmmakers


Hollywood has become focused on making product movies that are only about making large amounts of money.  It has made seemingly endless comic book movies, sequels and remakes.  The quality of filmmaking has declined terribly.  These movies are only for the lowest common denominator and waste the power of film and story telling.  
The best films come from directors with a vision.  These directors are auteurs and we need more of them.  To promote better filmmaking I’ve decided to create a list of current auteur filmmakers.  
This list is not complete or in order.  I need your help to try to name them all.  Enjoy.
Paul Thomas Anderson
Christopher Nolan
Tom Tykwer
Wes Anderson
Joel & Ethan Coen
Steven Soderbergh
Quentin Tarantino
Woody Allen
Spike Lee
Martin Scorsese
Baz Luhrman
Danny Boyle
Peter Jackson
Paul Greengrass
Kathryn Bigelow
James Mangold
Neill Blomkamp
Ridley Scott

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Run Lola Run - Analysis


Run Lola Run - Analysis
By Justin Seibel

Run Lola Run is a film about a dating relationship and how if one person in the relationship rushes ahead of the other, the other will be hurt.  The structure of the film plays out in three Acts where Lola replays the same 20 minutes over again.  Only on the third try she does finally get it right. 

In the first Act, Manni robs a grocery store and “rushes” Lola ahead farther than she was ready for.  Manni robs the store, but Lola is the one who gets shot.  In the second Act, Lola rushes ahead and tries to grab control by robbing her father’s bank of the $100,000 she needs to save Manni.  Lola robs the bank, but a truck hits Manni.  Both of their deaths have great symbolic moments of what it feels like if a person is hurt in a relationship.  A woman who loses her boy friend might say it felt like a stab in the chest or a shot through the heart.  That’s exactly what happens to Lola.  She takes a bullet dead in the center of her chest.  For a man who might have his girl friend break up with him, he might describe the pain as if he was hit by a Mac truck.  Lola rushes ahead, robs the bank, but Manni is the one who is hurt and literally run over by a truck.  Both characters are being selfish when they push ahead and it damages the other.  Which is true in a relationship.  What’s great about Run Lola Run is that there are many symbols that are physically used in the film to express the ideas of the director Tom Tykwer. 

One of the clues that points to this meaning of RLR are the red scenes in between the Acts when Lola and Manni lie in bed.  In each red scene, either Lola or Manni are questioning how the other is sure they love the other.  The one who is questioning is the one who had just died in the previous Act.  We know that this must have happened earlier in this scenario because after the red scene it comes back to the dying person in the Act then starts the new Act.  The red scenes act as primer to solving the problem.  They are the keys that tell you what the Act was about. 

The third Act, Lola has run out of options.  She learns as she goes through the Acts.  When Lola first picks up the gun when Manni is robbing the store, she doesn’t know how to take the safety off, but in Act two she knows how to shoot a gun.  When Lola knows that there’s a dog on the stairs at the beginning of Act three she jumps over it.  This helps her be early for her entire run.  She stops Mr. Meyer allowing him to drive and pick up Lola’s dad before she gets there.  She can’t rob the bank and she’s got to keep Manni from robbing the store.  There’s got to be a way for them to get the money in a legal way.

At the end of Act one, Lola is pleading in her head for Manni to wait.  In the moment we think it’s literally for the story point that he’s going to rob the store, but now we can see it as he is pushing Lola forward in the relationship before she is ready.  Here in Act three, Lola doesn’t know what to do and begins running.  She’s almost praying, “I’m waiting.  What do you want me to do?  I’m waiting.  I’m waiting.”  She isn’t trying to rush Manni.  She is earnest about wanting the situation to work out, but not sure of what to do.  There’s something about singlehood that is about waiting.  Everyone wants a relationship, but if it’s rushed it could be the wrong relationship for both of you.  Lola gets to that patient and contented place waiting to find the right one.  She awakens to be staring at a casino.  This leads to one of the most emotional climaxes I’ve ever seen in film.  Lola only has one hundred dollars and she’s going to make a bet on roulette.  The symbolism of her bets are the same as if you like someone and hope it works out.  Let’s say you like some and want to date them.  That’s what it’s like when she puts her first bet down.  You are invested, but if it doesn’t work out it’s not a big loss.  It’s the same investment as you heart.  Maybe if you like someone, but don’t get to date it could hurt, but not as bad as a divorce.  When she takes her winnings, now $3,500, and doubles down on the same number she is more invested.  This is symbolic of a dating relationship and wanting it to become a marriage.  It’s important to note that it’s the same number.  It’s like she’s betting on the same guy again.  In reality it’d be crazy to bet on the same number again.  For the symbolism of the movie it works.  When the ball is spinning around the roulette wheel and Lola screams with all her might she’s expressing that hope we have that the relationship will work out.  It’s out of her hands, it’s chance and it’s everything Lola is hoping for.  Lola screams with all her might, she gets lucky and wins again.  Her winnings add up to over the $100,000 needed to help Manni. 

Lola has saved the day, but the story wouldn’t be complete unless Manni worked his issues too.  Many times in a relationship it’s not just one person that needs to work on things, but both.  In RLR, both Manni and Lola need to work things out and not push the other before they are ready.  Lola learns patience and wins the money and by her working on herself she helps Manni work out his own issues and he gets the money back.  By Lola acting the way she does in the third Act, it puts the trash bag guy near Manni and he gets the money back.  It’s just like both people working on themselves.  Many times problems are amplified by other people and their reactions to our issues.  Another benefit of not rushing the other person is that the issues get worked out.  So in the end not only does Manni get the money back, now Lola actually has a wealth of money for the two of them.

Finally, in the mythic structure, once Lola has learned her lesson she has the healing elixir to bring back to her townspeople.  She has learned her lesson and when she gets into the ambulance she is able to heal the guy having a heart attack.  The previous two Acts she doesn’t get in the ambulance, but the last time she does.  Obviously, there’s nothing medical about what she does by holding the guy’s hand so it must be symbolically that she helps him.  With the other symbols that Tykwer uses it can be accepted that it’s only because Lola has learned her lesson that she’s able give and not take any more.  Since she did things the right way she is able to help instead of taking, as in robbing a bank.  Along with slaying her dragon comes the gold.  At the end, not only has Lola solved her problem as well as Manni solving his, but she also now has the gold, the winnings from the casino. There are bonuses for doing what’s right. 

Run Lola Run is a great symbolic film with great lessons about dating and relationships.  It made me a huge fan of Tom Tykwer and I hope he goes back to this type of filmmaking.